Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
๐ Chris22, HLS '22 |
1
0
Keeble v. Hickeringill
(1707) 103 ER 1127
Help us make LSD better
Tags:ย
Property
,
Possession
,
First possession
tl;dr:
An owner of land with a decoy pond is the first possessor of the ducks that swim in the pond. A neighbor who scares the ducks away
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
๐คฏ High points ๐คฏ
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
In this English property law case, the plaintiff owned land...
Holding:
The plaintiff had a property right to the ducks, so...
Keeble v. Hickeringill
Chat for Keeble v. Hickeringill
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-362
๐
Chat vibe: 0
๐
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you