Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
๐ Okapi13, SLS '24 |
0
0
Jerry Locks v. Gerald Wade
36 N.J.Super. 128 (Superior Court of New Jersey, 1955)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:ย
Lost Volume Profits
,
Mitigation
tl;dr:
Lessor is only entitled to lost volume profits if they suffered an actual loss in profits due to lessee's breach on jukebox contract.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
๐คฏ High points ๐คฏ
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Plaintiff Locks contracted to lease a jukebox to Defendant Wade....
Holding:
The ruling below was affirmed because Locks was not able...
Jerry Locks v. Gerald Wade
Chat for Jerry Locks v. Gerald Wade
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-116
๐
Chat vibe: 0
๐
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you