Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Okapi13, SLS '24 |

0 0

Jerry Locks v. Gerald Wade

36 N.J.Super. 128 (Superior Court of New Jersey, 1955)

tl;dr: Lessor is only entitled to lost volume profits if they suffered an actual loss in profits due to lessee's breach on jukebox contract.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Locks contracted to lease a jukebox to Defendant Wade....

Holding:The ruling below was affirmed because Locks was not able...

Jerry Locks v. Gerald Wade

Chat for Jerry Locks v. Gerald Wade
brief-116
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you