Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Jacob & Youngs v. Kent

230 N.Y. 239 (N.Y. 1921)

Tags: Contracts, Material breach, Substantial performance

tl;dr: Defendant specifically asked contractors to use Reading pipe when remodeling his home. P did not use Reading pipe.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff built a home for Defendant but used pipes other...

Holding:Affirmed. When the difference in value between the materials contracted...

Jacob & Youngs v. Kent

Chat for Jacob & Youngs v. Kent
brief-236
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you