Warning

Info

🏅 Jawshu, CLS '24 |

0 0

Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent

129 N.E. 889 (1921)

tl;dr: A general contractor used the wrong brand of pipe when building a home. The difference was insignificant, so they didn’t need to replace it.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:General contractor Jacob & Youngs, Inc. (plaintiff) brought a suit...

Holding:The plaintiff’s error appears not to be fraudulent or willful,...

Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent

Chat for Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent
brief-54
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you