Alabama Supreme Court - 8 Ala. 131
In the 1845 case of Kirksey v. Kirksey, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled on a breach of promise dispute regarding land and housing.
Antillico was a widow with several children. Her brother-in-law, who lived 60 miles away, wrote to her on October 10, 1840, telling her that he had learned of the death of his brother, Antillico’s late husband. He said that he would provide her and her children a house and land to cultivate if she would sell her house, quit the country, and come down and see him. She moved within a month or two and lived in a comfortable house provided by her brother-in-law for two years. After that period, he put her in a less comfortable house in the woods, and eventually he forced her to leave.
Antillico brought suit for breach of contract and was awarded $200 in damages. Her brother-in-law appealed
The Alabama Supreme Court overturned the lower court's decision, stating that no valid contract existed as Isaac's promise was a mere act of generosity not backed by legal consideration. They reasoned that since Angelico didn't give up anything valuable by moving to Isaac's land, she experienced no detriment. Furthermore, the court highlighted the absence of specific terms concerning the length or details of Isaac's gift.
This case is significant because it demonstrates the legal concept of consideration and its necessity for establishing and enforcing a contract. Additionally, it illustrates how courts address issues such as gratuitous promises, detriment, benefit, and certainty of terms in contract-related disputes.
The court is split on whether the defendant's promise to give the plaintiff a house and land in exchange for her relocation is a valid consideration for a contract. The majority believes that the plaintiff's loss and inconvenience of moving is enough consideration, while the minority sees the promise as a mere gift. The lower court's decision is overturned based on the parties' agreement.
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.