Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Pilea, HLS '24 |

3 0

International Shoe Co. v. State of WA

326 U.S. 310, 66 S. Ct. 154 (1945)

tl;dr: A company serving multiple states had salespeople operating in one state. The state was able to exercise jurisdiction over the company, because the presence of the salespeople counted as sufficient minimum contacts of the company with the state.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:International Shoe was a corporation incorporated in Delaware, and with...

Holding:Historically, the ability of the court to exert personal jurisdiction...

International Shoe Co. v. State of WA

Chat for International Shoe Co. v. State of WA
brief-5
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you