Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller

(1971)

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - 453 F.2d 12

tl;dr:

In general, the courts will not compel prosecution.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingInmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller case brief facts & holding

Facts:The plaintiffs in this civil suit were individuals who had...

Holding:The court held against the plaintiffs, finding that it could...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The Attica Correctional Facility prisoners are seeking accountability from the State for events that occurred during and after a four-day riot resulting in the death of 43 people. The plaintiffs' counsel requested an injunction against the interrogation of inmates without the presence of counsel and the appointment of federal monitors to ensure compliance. The district court denied the plaintiffs' request for an injunction against interrogating prisoners without counsel present, but the court found that the mistreatment of inmates violated their Eighth Amendment rights and may be enjoined where there is a danger of recurrent violation. The court concluded that preliminary injunctive relief should have been granted against further physical abuse, torture, beatings, or similar conduct against vulnerable prisoners. The court determined that a class action is appropriate for the prayer for injunctive relief against brutality or the threat of it, and reversed the district court's order denying the appellants' application to maintain the suit as a class action. The district court is directed to issue a preliminary injunction against such conduct and consider specific measures to implement the injunction, including the appointment of federal monitors to serve at Attica.

Opinion (Concurrence), author: LUMBARD, Circuit Judge
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

Judge Lumbard agrees with Judge Mansfield but disagrees with Judge Oakes regarding the provision of counsel for prisoners prior to interrogation. He believes that an injunction can only be issued if there is a real probability of continued physical abuse or harassment. The case states that Miranda v. Arizona does not require the state to conduct its investigation in any particular way or give specific warnings to all persons who may be interrogated during an investigation. Miranda only requires that a defendant's statement cannot be used against them unless they have been given certain warnings and have knowingly chosen to speak with or without counsel. The state may choose to give warnings to some and not to others based on who would serve as a witness or a defendant.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Opinion (Concurring-in-part-and-dissenting-in-part), author: OAKES, Circuit Judge
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The Legal Aid Society has modified its request for relief in the Attica inmates mistreatment case to allow each inmate to consult with a Legal Aid Society lawyer before or during interrogation by state officials. Inmates may not have communicated their true wishes due to fear of harassment, abuse, disciplinary reprisal, or effects on parole. The arbitrary deprivation of "good time" credits in the past may have affected the voluntariness of inmates' choices to seek or not seek counsel. The relief sought is a consultation to determine whether an inmate should exercise their right to consult counsel before being interrogated by state officials considering prosecution, as established in Miranda v. Arizona and Escobedo v. Illinois. Precedent exists for granting such relief.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller

Chat for Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockerfeller
brief-752
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.