Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois

(1892)

Supreme Court of the United States - 146 U.S. 387

tl;dr:

The lakebed of the Great Lakes belong to the state in which they are found, and such lands are held in public trust.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingIllinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois case brief facts & holding

Facts:The Illinois Railroad Company contracted with the city of Chicago...

Holding:The court held that the state owned the submerged lakebed...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: Me. Justice Field
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The legal dispute between the State of Illinois and the Illinois Central Railroad Company concerns the ownership of the bed of Lake Michigan and the right to develop the harbor of Chicago. The court will determine whether the railroad company encroached upon the state's dominion, sovereignty, and proprietary right over lands under the navigable waters of the Great Lakes, and whether the state granted the company permission to do so. The court will also examine the validity of the company's claim to make further encroachments based on a grant from the state in April 1869. The State holds title to the lands under navigable waters in trust for the people, and while it may grant parcels for public interest, it cannot relinquish control over the entire harbor. The company's ownership and use of the piers are valid under riparian ownership law if they do not extend beyond the point of navigability. The confirmation made by the act cannot be used to extend the railroad company's riparian rights beyond its ownership of lands in sections ten and fifteen on the shore of the lake. The city has the power to prescribe conditions for the entry and use of the land.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Dissenting opinion, author: Mr-. Justice Shiras
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The legal case involves determining whether the State of Illinois has the power to grant private property rights in lands under the waters of Lake Michigan to the Illinois Central Railroad Company. The grant must be made through a valid enactment and not legally revoked. The corporation was granted the authority to survey, locate, construct, complete, alter, maintain, and operate a railroad with one or more tracks or lines of rails from the southern terminus of the Illinois and Michigan Canal to Cairo, with a branch to Chicago on Lake Michigan, and another branch via Galena to a point on the Mississippi River opposite Dubuque in the State of Iowa. The corporation is required to pay into the treasury of the State, on the first Monday of December and June of each year, five percent of the gross receipts of the road and branches for the preceding six months, in exchange for the grants, privileges, and franchises conferred. The corporation is also required to pay an annual tax for state purposes on all its property and assets. The act of November 5, 1849, provides a method for condemning land required for railroad use and grants the corporation fee simple title to the land upon entry of judgment. The corporation is exempt from all taxation except as provided for in the charter. The corporation is prohibited from locating their track within any city without the consent of the common council of said city, as per the eighth section of the charter. The common council of Chicago gave consent to the location of the railroad within the city through an ordinance passed on June 14, 1852.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois

Chat for Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Illinois
brief-582
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.