Warning
Info
- - tl;dr
- - ICRA
- - Facts & Holding
- - DeepDive
0 0
Supreme Court of New Mexico - 106 N.M. 692, 106 N.M. 692, 749 P.2d 77
Tags: Capacity
Video Summary
Case Summary
In the 1988 case of Heights Realty, Ltd. v. Phillips, the New Mexico Supreme Court dealt with a dispute between a real estate company, Heights Realty, and E.A. Phillips, representing the estate of an elderly woman named Johnye Mary Gholson. Heights claimed they were owed commission for finding a buyer for Gholson's property after she had signed an exclusive listing contract with them. However, Phillips argued that Gholson lacked the mental capacity to enter a valid contract, so it should be rescinded.
The trial court sided with Phillips, ruling that Gholson was incompetent when signing the contract. This decision was based on significant evidence, including testimony from Phillips, Gholson's granddaughter, and a psychiatrist. They all stated that Gholson suffered from dementia and couldn't manage her affairs. Heights appealed, but the Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's judgment.
This case is important because it highlights the legal concept of capacity, an essential element for a valid contract. Capacity concerns a person's ability to understand and appreciate the consequences of entering a contract. Mentally incompetent individuals, along with minors and intoxicated persons, are generally deemed to lack capacity and can therefore avoid contractual obligations. This principle protects such individuals from exploitation or coercion by dishonest parties. However, there are exceptions, such as contracts for necessary items or contracts later ratified by mentally competent persons.
DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition
This case involves a dispute over an exclusive listing contract between Heights Realty and Johnye Mary Gholson. Heights Realty sought commission for providing a buyer to purchase Gholson's property, but Gholson was later adjudicated incompetent and E.A. Phillips was appointed conservator of her estate. The district court found that Gholson lacked the mental capacity to have validly executed the listing contract and entered judgment in favor of Phillips. Heights Realty appealed, arguing that the presumption of competency was not overcome by clear and convincing evidence. However, the court disagreed and affirmed the judgment of the district court. The test for mental capacity is whether a person can understand the nature and effect of the act they are engaged in. The law presumes that every person is competent, and the burden of proof rests on the person asserting lack of capacity to establish the same by clear and convincing proof. The court considers various factors, including the individual's physical condition, adequacy of consideration, whether the transaction was improvident, the relation of trust and confidence between the parties, and the weakness of the mind of the alleged incompetent person as judged by all other acts within a reasonable time prior and subsequent to the act in question. The testimony of those who observed the speech and conduct of the person on the date the instrument is executed is given more weight than the testimony of those who observed prior to or after that date.
LSD+ Case Briefs
Features
- DeepDive for detailed case analysis
- Over 50,000 existing case briefs
- Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
- Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
- Social learning with chat and high points
Over 50,000 Cases Briefed
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
14-Day Free Trial
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Integrated Legal Dictionary
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Brief anything. Instantly.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Social Learning with Chat and High Points
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Real-Time Brief Feedback
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.