Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

Harper v. Herman

499 N.W.2d 472 (Minn. 1993)

tl;dr: Plaintiff was out on Defendant's boat and dove into waters that Defendant knew were too shallow for diving; Court holds that Defendant had no duty to warn Plaintiff and thus cannot be held liable for his injuries.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant Herman (64-year-old) hosted Plaintiff Harper (20-year-old) on his boat....

Holding:The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed.The Court noted that superior knowledge...

Harper v. Herman

Chat for Harper v. Herman
brief-402
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you