tl;dr: A Defendant sold a car to a minor. The minor was making payments on the car, but then it broke down and Plaintiff wanted to void the agreement under the infancy doctrine. Defendant refused to restore the minor's consideration for the broken-down car.
IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
Facts & Holding
Facts:Defendant Lemke was boss to Plaintiff Halbman, a minor. Defendant...
Holding:Affirmed. Under the majority/traditional rule of the infancy doctrine, the...
🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD
I am still kind of biased toward the Clifton Forge area so that I can live with my girlfriend, but am definitely starting to consider places around lexington out of necessity\