Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Hadley v. Baxendale

156 Eng. Rep. 1220 (Exchequer 1854)

tl;dr: Delivery of mill shaft is delayed, but Plaintiff did not tell the Defendant carriers that their delay would cause a loss of profits at their mill.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Hadley had a broken crankshaft at his mill that...

Holding:Reversed. Unless a breaching party knows or has reason to...

Hadley v. Baxendale

Chat for Hadley v. Baxendale
brief-251
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you