🏅 Pilea, HLS '24 |

Gunn v. Minton

568 U.S. 251 (2013)

Tags: Civil Procedure, Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Federal Question

tl;dr: A hypothetical question of patent law does not qualify a case to be heard in federal court on the basis of federal question subject matter jurisdiction.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:In 1995, Minton leased some fintech (TEXCEN) he had developed...

Holding:Federal courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction over cases in...

Gunn v. Minton

Chat for Gunn v. Minton

Brief General >T14 Big mad

Warning

Info

Gunn v. Minton

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:In 1995, Minton leased some fintech (TEXCEN) he had developed...

Holding:Federal courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction over cases in...

Gunn v. Minton

Help us make LSD better!