Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Gunn v. Minton

568 U.S. 251 (2013)

tl;dr: A hypothetical question of patent law does not qualify a case to be heard in federal court on the basis of federal question subject matter jurisdiction.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:In 1995, Minton leased some fintech (TEXCEN) he had developed...

Holding:Federal courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction over cases in...

Gunn v. Minton

Chat for Gunn v. Minton
brief-273
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you