Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Groves v. John Wunder Co.

286 N.W. 235 (Sup. Ct. Minn. 1939)

tl;dr: Plaintiff owned a plant for sorting gravel, and contracted Defendant the rights to their plant with a renewal option. Defendant agreed that after removing the gravel from Plaintiff’s land, they would grade the land. They did not grade the land.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiffs owned a plant for sorting gravel on their land,...

Holding:Reversed. In a construction contract, the thing lost by a...

Groves v. John Wunder Co.

Chat for Groves v. John Wunder Co.
brief-245
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you