tl;dr: Plaintiff owned a plant for sorting gravel, and contracted Defendant the rights to their plant with a renewal option. Defendant agreed that after removing the gravel from Plaintiff’s land, they would grade the land. They did not grade the land.
IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
Facts & Holding
Facts:Plaintiffs owned a plant for sorting gravel on their land,...
Holding:Reversed. In a construction contract, the thing lost by a...
🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD
Bertie: I know this is kind of weird, but I've been reading this chat all cycle long as a MOM, and I CANNOT EXPRESS to you how much I've been rooting for you. You have been such a force of positivity, support, and good humor for everyone else all cycle long. All I wanted was for you to get into W&L because you so deserved it. This news has literally MADE MY DAY. This is absolutely the response you deserved for all the good karma you've shown to everyone else. You are going to do so well. Con
reversesplittercore
16:39
Haha I hope acceptances. I imagine they may move closer to to their letter intent though.