0 0
Supreme Court of the United States - 564 U.S. 915, 180 L. Ed. 2d 796, 131 S. Ct. 2846
In the 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, two boys' parents sued Goodyear USA and its foreign subsidiaries after a fatal bus accident in France, allegedly caused by a flawed tire from one of the subsidiaries. The legal battle took place in North Carolina, where the subsidiaries argued that the court had no authority over them.
The Supreme Court decided that the North Carolina court couldn't exercise general jurisdiction over the foreign subsidiaries, as their connections to the state weren't consistent or significant enough to consider them essentially "at home" there. The Court further explained the difference between general and specific jurisdiction, stating that only very few situations would allow a court to exercise general jurisdiction over foreign corporations.
The case involves a wrongful death suit filed by the parents of two young soccer players from North Carolina who died in a bus accident in France caused by a defective tire manufactured by Goodyear's foreign subsidiaries. The Supreme Court of the United States held that North Carolina courts lacked general jurisdiction over the foreign subsidiaries of Goodyear, as a limited connection, such as some of their tires reaching North Carolina through the stream of commerce, is insufficient to establish the continuous and systematic affiliation necessary for the exercise of general jurisdiction. The Court has primarily focused on circumstances that justify the exercise of specific jurisdiction, particularly in cases involving single or occasional acts within the forum state, and has reduced the role of general jurisdiction in modern jurisdiction theory.
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.