Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Frigaliment Importing v. B.N.S.

190 F. Supp. 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1960)

tl;dr: Two companies contracted for the sale of chicken. But Defendant supplied Plaintiff with fowl (stewing chicken) rather than the broiler and fryer chickens Plaintiffs wanted. The court was called upon to answer the question: What is "chicken"?

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Frigaliment (Swiss company) and Defendant BNS (chicken distributor) contracted...

Holding:Dismissed. Plaintiff did not produce enough evidence to show that...

Frigaliment Importing v. B.N.S.

Chat for Frigaliment Importing v. B.N.S.
brief-210
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you