Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth.

(2021)

Maine Supreme Judicial Court - F.Supp.3d

tl;dr:

This case is an example of a case in which a motion for a protective order of information requested in discovery is denied, but no sanction is granted.

Case Summary

In the 2018 case Freedom's Path at Dayton vs. Dayton Metro Housing Authority, the plaintiff accused the defendant of breaking the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Fair Housing Act (FHA) laws. They claimed the defendant blocked funds for affordable housing for veterans, many of whom are disabled. They also alleged that the defendant didn't apply for a federal rental assistance program for veterans, instead applying for it themselves. The plaintiff said the defendant denied their request for a reasonable accommodation under the ADA and FHA laws.

This case is significant because it addresses discrimination and housing access for people with disabilities, especially disabled veterans who have served their country. The case highlights the challenges and conflicts between groups attempting to get federal funding for housing projects. Additionally, it demonstrates the role of discovery in civil lawsuits: both parties filed motions to make or limit depositions of various individuals involved in the dispute. The court had to weigh the relevance, proportionality, and burden of the discovery requests with both parties' rights and interests.

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingFreedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth. case brief facts & holding

Facts:DMHA agreed to provide necessary support for Freedom’s Path to...

Holding:The court evaluates the six prongs of proportionality to determine...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth. | Case Brief DeepDive
Opinion, author: SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The court has granted a preliminary injunction to Eli Lilly and Company and Lilly USA, LLC, preventing the government from implementing or enforcing the Administrative Dispute Resolution Regulation related to the 340B Drug Pricing Program. The court found that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) did not comply with the procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when promulgating the ADR Rule. The plaintiffs argued that the ADR Rule violated the Appointments Clause and the APA's procedural requirements, and the court found that they have a reasonable likelihood of success in proving their case.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth.

Chat for Freedom's Path at Dayton v. Dayton Metro Hous. Auth.
brief-308
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.