Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Okapi13, SLS '24 |

0 0

Frank Dixon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

798 F.Supp. 2d 336 (Massachusetts D.C., 2011)

tl;dr: Reliance on a bank's promise to negotiate a loan, and not foreclose, is enforceable under promissory estoppel.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Dixon orally agreed with Defendant Wells Fargo to pursue...

Holding:Well Fargo's motion to dismiss was denied. Although the parties...

Frank Dixon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Chat for Frank Dixon v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
brief-93
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you