Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Foster v. Reiss

(1955)

Supreme Court of New Jersey - 112 A.2d 553, 18 N.J. 41

tl;dr:

Because a gift causa mortis supersedes a will, it must strictly follow the standards of validity.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Foster v. Reiss

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Foster v. Reiss case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingFoster v. Reiss case brief facts & holding

Facts:The defendant married his wife in 1940, and she created...

Holding:This was not a valid gift causa mortis, because the...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Foster v. Reiss case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Foster v. Reiss | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: Vanderbilt, C. J.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The legal case involves a dispute over whether a husband received a valid gift causa mortis from his wife. The court emphasizes that for a gift to be valid, there must be actual, unequivocal, and complete delivery of the property during the lifetime of the donor. Mere words of donation are not enough, and there must be an actual transfer of possession and control of the property. In New Jersey, an informal writing that establishes donative intent does not satisfy the requirement of delivery, except in cases where it is a deed or a sealed instrument. The court has declined to expand the doctrine of gifts causa mortis, and the scope of such gifts should not be increased. In this case, the decedent's note to her husband was not a valid authorization for him to take possession of the chattels mentioned because the decedent was under ether and unable to transact business at the time. The decision of the higher court is overturned, and the decision of the lower court will be reinstated.

Dissenting opinion, author: Jacobs, J.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The passage discusses the validity of a gift made by a competent property owner to her husband through a note in anticipation of her death. The argument is that the absence of direct physical delivery should not invalidate the gift as the donor's intentions are paramount. Courts should be more flexible and accept other evidence of donative intent rather than placing too much emphasis on delivery. However, the strict delivery requirement is essential to prevent fraudulent claims. The delivery standard for gifts causa mortis is less rigorous than for gifts between living individuals due to their emergency nature. The delivery rule for gifts causa mortis should not be applied too strictly, and the specific circumstances of the case should suffice for delivery.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Foster v. Reiss case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Foster v. Reiss case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Foster v. Reiss

Chat for Foster v. Reiss
brief-640
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.