Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 Okapi13, SLS '24 |
0
0
Forrest D. Ferguson v. Phoenix Assurance Company of New York
189 Kan. 459 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1962)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Conditions
tl;dr:
An evidentiary, not substantive, condition precedent for an insurance contract may be excused to allow for payout on a valid claim.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Plaintiff Ferguson's store's safe was robbed. Ferguson had an insurance...
Holding:
Judgment affirmed. Though the condition that both safe doors be...
Forrest D. Ferguson v. Phoenix Assurance Company of New York
Chat for Forrest D. Ferguson v. Phoenix Assurance Company of New York
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-110
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you