Warning

Info

Table of Contents
UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.

(1997)

Oklahoma Supreme Court - 933 P.2d 282

tl;dr:

Plaintiff company subcontracted with Defendant to field phone calls for outgoing flower orders for themselves, florists in their network, and third party companies. Defendant breached, causing a third-party client to end their contract with Plaintiff.nti

Video Summary


Case Summary

In the 1997 case Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc., the Oklahoma Supreme Court dealt with a breach of contract dispute between two companies. Florafax, a business selling flowers through telecommunications, sued GTE for not providing proper services, which led to Florafax losing profits from an associated contract with Bellerose Floral, a major floral retailer. Florafax argued that GTE was aware of the special conditions regarding the Bellerose contract and that its non-performance would result in lost profits for Florafax.

The jury awarded Florafax $1.5 million for two years of lost profits based on past performance and projected growth. However, the Court of Civil Appeals reduced the award to a 60-day period because of the termination clause in the Bellerose contract. The Oklahoma Supreme Court reinstated the original jury award, ruling that Florafax could recover lost profits as long as they were foreseeable, caused by GTE's breach, and accurately estimated. The court also determined that the termination clause did not stop the recovery of lost profits beyond 60 days since there was no proof that Bellerose would have terminated the contract if GTE had not breached.

This case highlights expectation damages and their limitations in contract law, which aim to put the injured party in the position they would have been in had the contract been fulfilled. These damages are subject to specific conditions, like foreseeability, causation, certainty, and mitigation. The case also showcases how courts interpret contractual provisions that impact damage calculations and balance the interests of both parties when enforcing contracts and awarding damages.

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingFlorafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc. case brief facts & holding

Facts:Plaintiff Florafax subcontracted with Defendant to field phone calls for...

Holding:Evidence regarding an established business’s performance is appropriate to consider...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc. | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: LAVENDER, Justice.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

Florafax International, Inc. sued GTE Market Resources, Inc. for breach of contract over telecommunication and telemarketing services. Florafax claimed lost profits due to a collateral contract with a third party that was allegedly canceled because of GTE's breach. The lower court awarded lost profits for two years, but the Court of Civil Appeals limited it to a 60-day period based on the collateral contract's termination clause. The Oklahoma Supreme Court upheld the lost profit award, finding it in line with substantive law and backed by adequate evidence. The court held that lost profits from a collateral contract can be recovered in a breach of contract action if they were within the contemplation of the parties at the time of contracting and proved with reasonable certainty. The court found that GTE had knowledge of the potential for profits from a collateral contract with Florafax and intentionally failed to perform during part of the term of the contract, implicating the lost profit clause of the contract. The court also held that the sixty-day termination clause in the Flora-fax/Bellerose contract does not preclude the recovery of lost profits beyond the sixty-day period.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc. case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.

Chat for Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.
brief-256
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.