Warning

Info

🏅 ALAB, SLS '24 |

0 0

Embry v. Hargadine, McKittrick Dry Goods Co.

105 S.W. 777 (MO 1907)

tl;dr: Boss insinuates that employee's contract will be renewed. Regardless of the boss's intention, a contract was formed because a reasonable person would have interpreted the boss's words as a promise.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Embry was employed by Defendant Hargadine, but his contract...

Holding:Lower court erred in instructing jury that both parties had...

Embry v. Hargadine, McKittrick Dry Goods Co.

Chat for Embry v. Hargadine, McKittrick Dry Goods Co.
brief-395
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you