Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |
0
0
Embry v. Hargadine, McKittrick Dry Goods Co.
127 Mo. App. 383 (Mo. 1907)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Contracts
,
Mutual assent
See also:
Lucy v. Zehmer
tl;dr:
Employee thinks that his contract was renewed based on a convo with the company president, but the company fires him a few weeks later.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Embry, an employee at Defendant company, told the company's president...
Holding:
"If the conversation was according to Embry's version, and he...
Embry v. Hargadine, McKittrick Dry Goods Co.
Chat for Embry v. Hargadine, McKittrick Dry Goods Co.
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-126
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you