Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Edwards v. Sims

(1929)

Kentucky Court of Appeals - 24 S.W.2d 619, 232 Ky. 791

Tags: Property

tl;dr:

The court has the right to order a survey of an owner's land to determine the coextensive property rights of adjacent landowners.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Edwards v. Sims

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Edwards v. Sims case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingEdwards v. Sims case brief facts & holding

Facts:Edwards owned property on which the opening to a cave...

Holding:The court was within its authority to order a survey...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Edwards v. Sims case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Edwards v. Sims | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: Commissioner Stanley
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The case involves an appeal to reverse an order by the lower court to survey the Great Onyx Cave for evidence. The issue is whether the court has the power to invade an owner's property rights to determine if they are trespassing on their neighbor's property. The court believes that a court of equity has the inherent power to compel an inspection of a mine owner's works if there is reasonable suspicion of trespassing. The respondent cites several cases from other jurisdictions where this power has been recognized and exercised. The appeal was dismissed as the order was interlocutory and not appealable. The case does not involve the severance of cave rights from the surface estate.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Edwards v. Sims case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Dissenting opinion, author: Judge Logan.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

Judge Logan dissents from the majority opinion that the owner of the surface of real estate owns everything below and above it. He argues that the owner of the surface has the right to everything that can be taken from the earth and used for their benefit, but not to a cave or cavern unless they own the entrance and have explored and connected the reaches of the cave to the entrance. He suggests that the old principle that the owner of the surface of land owns everything from the zenith to nadir must be reformed to fit present-day conditions. The true principle should be that the owner of the surface owns everything upon, above, or under it which they may use for their profit or pleasure and subject to their dominion and control, but their ownership cannot extend beyond what they can use and benefit from, and which may be of benefit to others.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Edwards v. Sims case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Edwards v. Sims case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Edwards v. Sims

Chat for Edwards v. Sims
brief-507
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.