Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Drennan v. Star Paving Company

333 P.2d 757 (Cal. 1958)

tl;dr: A general contractor ("GC") relied on a subcontractor's ("SC") bid when bidding for a project. The GC won the contract for the project, but the SC withdrew its offer because it couldn't do the job for the price it listed in the bid.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Drennan put in a bid for a large project...

Holding:Reasonable reliance creates an option contract (even if there’s no...

Drennan v. Star Paving Company

Chat for Drennan v. Star Paving Company
brief-136
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you