Warning

Info

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.
Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Back to briefs

Dred Scott v. Sandford

60 U.S. 393 (1856)

tl;dr: Enslaved people are not granted rights and protections of the Constitution.

1L is really, really hard. Save time, crush cold calls, and excel on exams with LSD's AI case briefs.

We simplify dense legal cases into easy-to-understand summaries, helping you master legal complexities and excel in your studies.

AI Deep DiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Level 1
Click below 👇 to deep dive

The decision in the case between Lathrop L. Sturgis and Christian Honold has been upheld after a review. Justice Curtis wrote the majority opinion, which affirms the judgment of the Circuit Court. The decision was based on the same facts and principles as the preceding case.

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.

Facts & Holding

Facts:Dred Scott was an enslaved person who lived in a...

Holding:The decision of the lower court was affirmed.The words "all...

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.

Dred Scott v. Sandford

Chat for Dred Scott v. Sandford
brief-764
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.