Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

David v. G.N. Mortgage Corp.

396 F.3d 869 (7th Cir. 2005)

tl;dr: Plaintiffs took out a mortgage and were presented with two stacks of paper by Defendant's agent. They signed without reading, but then found out that a term in the contract was different from what they thought they had agreed to.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiffs took out a mortgage loan, and were presented with...

Holding:Affirmed. The parol evidence is inadmissible here in the face...

David v. G.N. Mortgage Corp.

Chat for David v. G.N. Mortgage Corp.
brief-206
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you