United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - 129 F.3d 261
In the 1997 case, Rogath v. Siebenmann before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the buyer of a claimed Francis Bacon self-portrait, David Rogath, sued the seller, Werner Siebenmann, for breach of warranty and other legal issues. Siebenmann had promised he was the sole owner of the $570,000 painting and assured its legitimacy; however, when an art dealer noticed doubts about its authenticity, Rogath sued Siebenmann for breach of contract, breach of warranty, and fraud.
The district court supported Rogath, awarding him $950,000 based on the painting's resale price, and dismissed the other claims. On appeal, the Court of Appeals upheld the summary judgment, stating that Siebenmann's warranties were valid under New York law. The court determined Siebenmann's assurances had swayed Rogath to buy the painting and that they were part of the contract, dismissing Siebenmann's argument that Rogath knowingly accepted any issues with the painting's authenticity.
This case highlights the legal concept of warranty, which involves contractual assurances about the good being purchased. Warranties can be based on stated promises, statutory law, and common law, and serve to protect buyers from misrepresented or defective products, holding sellers accountable for the accuracy and truthfulness of their claims.
This case involves the sale of a painting with authenticity issues. The plaintiff sold the painting to a third party who later requested a refund due to the issues. The plaintiff sued the defendant for breach of warranty and was granted partial summary judgment by the district court. The defendant appealed the grant of partial summary judgment, while the plaintiff cross-appealed the denial of his motion for attachment and the dismissal of his fraud and breach of contract claims. The UCC governs breach of warranty claims in a contract for the sale of goods. The critical question is whether the buyer believed they were purchasing the seller's promise as to the truth of the warranted information. The court established that a buyer who closes on a contract with full knowledge of facts disclosed by the seller that would constitute a breach of warranty under the contract should be foreclosed from later asserting the breach, unless the buyer expressly preserves their rights under the warranties. The issue at hand is whether the buyer was informed about the doubts surrounding the painting's authenticity and whether they disregarded this information.
LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.
Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.
Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.
Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.
DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.
Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.
Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.
Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.