🏅 Okapi13, SLS '24 |

0 0

David Plotnik et al. v. John Meihaus et al.

208 Cal.App.4th 1590 (California Court of Appeal, 2012)

Tags: Emotional Distress

See also: Elliot Kaplan and Jeanne Kaplan v. Mayo Clinic

tl;dr: Breaching a contract to not harass a neighbor allows for an award of emotional distress damages.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Sign in to share

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Plotnik and Defendant Meihaus were neighbors. They got into...

Holding:The jury verdict was affirmed. The Court of Appeal found...

David Plotnik et al. v. John Meihaus et al.

Chat for David Plotnik et al. v. John Meihaus et al.

Brief General >T14 Big mad

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎