Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Okapi13, SLS '24 |

0 0

David Plotnik et al. v. John Meihaus et al.

208 Cal.App.4th 1590 (California Court of Appeal, 2012)

tl;dr: Breaching a contract to not harass a neighbor allows for an award of emotional distress damages.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Plotnik and Defendant Meihaus were neighbors. They got into...

Holding:The jury verdict was affirmed. The Court of Appeal found...

David Plotnik et al. v. John Meihaus et al.

Chat for David Plotnik et al. v. John Meihaus et al.
brief-120
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you