Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property Regime

333 S.C. 71 (1998)

tl;dr: Plaintiff took the stairs in Defendant's building despite knowing they were badly lit and was injured in a fall; Court holds that Plaintiff's assumption of risk does not completely bar his recovery.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff rented a condo unit in Defendant's apartment. There were...

Holding:The South Carolina Supreme Court affirmed and remanded for a...

Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property Regime

Chat for Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property Regime
brief-612
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you