Warning

Info

Table of Contents
Chris22, HLS '22 |

1 0

Back to briefs

Commonwealth v. Roebuck

(2011)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania - 32 A.3d 613

tl;dr:

A defendant can be convicted of third degree murder under an accomplice theory of liability so long as it is proven that he had the requisite criminal intent required under the statute.

Video Summary

ICRAIssue, Conclusion, Rule, Analysis for Commonwealth v. Roebuck

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Commonwealth v. Roebuck case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Facts & HoldingCommonwealth v. Roebuck case brief facts & holding

Facts:The defendant helped to plan a situation in which the...

Holding:The court held that a defendant can be convicted for...

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Commonwealth v. Roebuck case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

DeepDiveHighlight a legal term to see the definition

Font size -+
Commonwealth v. Roebuck | Case Brief DeepDive
Majority opinion, author: Justice SAYLOR.
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The case concerns whether accomplice liability can be applied to third-degree murder. The intermediate court held that accomplice theory applies in third-degree murder scenarios where the intentional acts demonstrate a disregard for human life amounting to malice, even if homicide was not the intended underlying crime. The defendant argues that accomplice liability for third-degree murder is a legal anomaly due to his impossibility syllogism. The defendant cites a series of Superior Court opinions and decisions from other jurisdictions that disapprove convictions based on logical and/or legal impossibility. The Appellant argues that conspiracy to commit third-degree murder is impossible because it requires intending to commit an unintentional killing. The Commonwealth argues that accomplice liability applies to third-degree murder, as the shared criminal intent behind the conduct establishes criminal culpability. The American Law Institute's Model Penal Code (MPC) was designed to establish legal accountability for an accomplice for unintended results caused by a principal.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Commonwealth v. Roebuck case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

Opinion (Concurrence), author: Justice EAKIN
Level 1
Click below 👇 to DeepDive

The statement clarifies that an individual may be held responsible for being an accomplice to third-degree murder even if they had no intention to kill. Third-degree murder does not require a specific intent but involves a malicious act resulting in death. An individual may be held liable if they help or encourage another person who knowingly disregards a significant risk of death. The legal theory applied in the Kimbrough case was appropriate and reasonable, as per the Chief Justice's agreement.

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

LSD+ exclusive

This content is exclusively for LSD+ users.

Sign up for LSD+ for full access to the Commonwealth v. Roebuck case brief summary.

Enjoy unlimited access with our 14-day free trial.

LSD+ Case Briefs

Features

  • DeepDive for detailed case analysis
  • Over 50,000 existing case briefs
  • Instant briefs for another 6,000,000 cases
  • Highlight dictionary for legal term definitions
  • Social learning with chat and high points

Over 50,000 Cases Briefed

LSD+ gives you access to over 50,000 case briefs, more than anyone else. Be the first to email us the website of a case brief product that offers you more case briefs and we'll give you a free year of LSD+.

14-Day Free Trial

Unlimited access. Read as much content as you want during your trial with no device limitations. Cancel any time during your trial and keep access for the full 14 days.

Integrated Legal Dictionary

Lawyers and judges love to use big words. And Latin, for some reason.

Highlight a legal term in LSD Briefs and get an instant, plain English definition. Try highlighting contract or specific performance. No need to search or read through a list of definitions, simply highlight the words you don’t know and our LSDefine integration will instantly give you a definition to any of over 30,000 legal terms.

DeepDive

DeepDive allows you to explore legal cases like never before. DeepDive offers multiple levels of case summaries, which empowers you to quickly and easily find the information you need to stay on top of readings. Easily navigate through summary levels and click on any text to get more detail, all the way down to the original legal case text.

Brief anything. Instantly.

Our proprietary state-of-the-art system can instantly brief over 6,000,000 US cases. That means we can probably brief that case that your professor assigned last night when she sent you a poorly scanned pdf and told you to read every third paragraph. Or maybe she uploaded it to Canvas and didn’t really tell you to read it, but you know you probably should. Tenure does wild things to good people.

Social Learning with Chat and High Points

Study groups are a great way to learn and explore a case. LSD has chat rooms for each case to let you ask questions across the community and hear what other students struggled with and how they put it all together. Learn the key points of every case from other LSD+ users and share your knowledge with LSD High Points.

Real-Time Brief Feedback

Don’t settle for mistakes in briefs that have been there for 10 years and never fixed. Find an issue or something missing from a brief? Down vote and we will make improvements. All of our case brief editors graduated from from T14 law schools.

Commonwealth v. Roebuck

Chat for Commonwealth v. Roebuck
brief-728
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.