Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Clark v. Maloney

3 Del. 68 (1840)

tl;dr: A first finder of chattels has a better claim to title than a second finder, and losing property does not divest him of his property interest.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:The plaintiff had found some logs floating along a river...

Holding:The plaintiff had a better title to the logs. It...

Clark v. Maloney

Chat for Clark v. Maloney
brief-536
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you