Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Lan, SLS '24 |

0 0

Carter v. Kinney

896 S.W.2d 926 (Mo. 1995)

tl;dr: Kinneys invited Carter over to their house, and Carter slipped on the frosty sidewalk outside; Court holds that Carter was a licensee and thus the Kinneys only had a duty to protect him from known dangers.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff Carter slipped on the icy sidewalk and broke his...

Holding:The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed.The Court held that because the...

Carter v. Kinney

Chat for Carter v. Kinney
brief-530
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you