Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

1 Q.B. 256 (Queen's Bench 1892)

tl;dr: A company posted an advertisement claiming that using its product would protect users from catching the flu. Then, a woman used the product and got sick with the flu.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:The Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. posted an advertisement in the...

Holding:The advertisement constituted an offer. The plaintiff accepted the offer through...

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

Chat for Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
brief-132
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you