Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
๐ Pilea, HLS '24 |
0
0
Burnham v. Superior Court
495 U.S. 604, 110 S.Ct. 2105, 109 L.Ed.2d 631 (1990)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:ย
Civil Procedure
,
Personal Juris
tl;dr:
A man who is served with divorce while briefly physically present in a state renders himself subject to the jurisdiction of the state.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
๐คฏ High points ๐คฏ
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
In 1976, plaintiff/respondent (Francie Burnham) and defendant/petitioner (Dennis Burnham) were...
Holding:
Even in the new world of International Shoe v. WA,...
Burnham v. Superior Court
Chat for Burnham v. Superior Court
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-40
๐
Chat vibe: 0
๐
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you