Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Pilea, HLS '24 |

0 0

Burnham v. Superior Court

495 U.S. 604, 110 S.Ct. 2105, 109 L.Ed.2d 631 (1990)

tl;dr: A man who is served with divorce while briefly physically present in a state renders himself subject to the jurisdiction of the state.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:In 1976, plaintiff/respondent (Francie Burnham) and defendant/petitioner (Dennis Burnham) were...

Holding:Even in the new world of International Shoe v. WA,...

Burnham v. Superior Court

Chat for Burnham v. Superior Court
brief-40
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you