Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… Chris22, HLS '22 |

0 0

Brokaw v. Fairchild

135 Misc. 70, 237 N.Y.S. 6 (Sup. Ct. 1929)

tl;dr: A life tenant of a property cannot tear it down and build a new property; he must enjoy it in a manner that is consistent with the remainderman's interest in future possession.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Brokaw and Fairchild were life tenants in adjoining mansions. The...

Holding:Brokaw had no right to tear down his mansion and...

Brokaw v. Fairchild

Chat for Brokaw v. Fairchild
brief-586
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you