tl;dr: Plaintiff went on with the performance of its part of the contract with Defendant even after Defendant repudiated the contract, because the Plaintiff, for its own purposes, needed some of the materials it would gain from the performance.
IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
Facts & Holding
Facts:Plaintiff contracted with Defendant to sell its old land to...
Holding:Affirmed. Plaintiff’s continuation of performance even after notice of breach...
🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD
I am still kind of biased toward the Clifton Forge area so that I can live with my girlfriend, but am definitely starting to consider places around lexington out of necessity\