🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Bomberger v. McKelvey

35 Cal. 2d 607 (Sup. Ct. Cal. 1950)

tl;dr: Plaintiff went on with the performance of its part of the contract with Defendant even after Defendant repudiated the contract, because the Plaintiff, for its own purposes, needed some of the materials it would gain from the performance.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiff contracted with Defendant to sell its old land to...

Holding:Affirmed. Plaintiff’s continuation of performance even after notice of breach...

Bomberger v. McKelvey

Chat for Bomberger v. McKelvey
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you