Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
🏅 ALAB, SLS '24 |
0
0
Bernstein v. Nemeyer
570 A.2d 164 (C.T. 1990)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:
Contracts
,
unjust enrichment
,
restitution
tl;dr:
Partnership to flip apartments fails, and the parties both lose their investment. No restitution owed without unjust enrichment.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
🤯 High points 🤯
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Plaintiff Bernstein formed a partnership with Defendant Nemeyer to flip...
Holding:
Trial court decision is affirmed. The purpose of restitution is...
Bernstein v. Nemeyer
Chat for Bernstein v. Nemeyer
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-500
👍
Chat vibe: 0
👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you