Dashboard
Quick Access
My Profile
Recent Decisions
Graphs
Search
LSD Proofreader
Articles & Wisdom
Research
Law Schools
Rankings
Search
Articles & Wisdom
Applicants
Admissions Graphs
Recent Decisions
Soft Tiers
LSAT
Students
LSD Briefs
Student Loans
Articles & Wisdom
Creep a rando
LSD+
Sign in
Warning
Info
๐ ALAB, SLS '24 |
0
0
Bailey v. West
105 R.I. 61, 249 A.2d 414 (1969)
Help us make LSD better
Tags:ย
Contracts
,
implied in fact
,
quasi-contract
tl;dr:
Farmer boards a horse knowing that the horse's ownership is disputed. A contract was not formed and the farmer is not entitled to compensation.
IRAC
Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
๐คฏ High points ๐คฏ
Key points contributed by students on LSD
Sign in to share
Facts & Holding
Facts:
Defendant West bought a racehorse but found out it was...
Holding:
West does not owe Bailey compensation for his care of...
Bailey v. West
Chat for Bailey v. West
Brief
General
>T14
Big mad
DMs
Visit a user's profile start a DM.
DMs will become an
LSD+
exclusive after the beta testing period.
brief-344
๐
Chat vibe: 0
๐
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you