Warning

Info

๐Ÿ… ALAB, SLS '24 |

0 0

Bailey v. West

105 R.I. 61, 249 A.2d 414 (1969)

tl;dr: Farmer boards a horse knowing that the horse's ownership is disputed. A contract was not formed and the farmer is not entitled to compensation.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

๐Ÿคฏ High points ๐ŸคฏKey points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant West bought a racehorse but found out it was...

Holding:West does not owe Bailey compensation for his care of...

Bailey v. West

Chat for Bailey v. West
brief-344
๐Ÿ‘ Chat vibe: 0 ๐Ÿ‘Ž
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you