Warning

Info

🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

0 0

Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.

29 N.Y.2d 124 (Ct. App. N.Y. 1971)

tl;dr: A subcontractor threatened a general contractor with the denial of performance if the general contractor did not grant the subcontractor other bids and pay them more.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Defendant Loral entered a contract with the Navy to furnish...

Holding:Reversed as to the dismissal of Defendant's claim, but affirmed...

Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.

Chat for Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.
brief-192
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you