Connection lost
Server error
Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Legal Definitions - nonparticipating royalty
Where you see wrong or inequality or injustice, speak out, because this is your country. This is your democracy. Make it. Protect it. Pass it on.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Definition of nonparticipating royalty
A nonparticipating royalty is a type of royalty payment made to an author or inventor for each copy of their work or article sold under a copyright or patent. This means that the author or inventor receives a set amount of money for each sale of their work, regardless of how much profit the seller makes.
For example, if an author has a nonparticipating royalty agreement with their publisher, they may receive $1 for every copy of their book sold, regardless of whether the book is sold for $10 or $100. This type of royalty is different from a participating royalty, where the author or inventor receives a percentage of the profits made from each sale.
In legal cases involving copyright, patent, or trademark infringement, the reasonable-royalty standard is often used to determine damages. This means that the court will consider what a licensee would be willing to pay the holder of the intellectual-property rights while still making a reasonable profit from its use.
For example, if a company is found to have infringed on a patent, the court may determine that a reasonable royalty for the use of that patent would have been $10 per unit sold. The company would then be required to pay the patent holder $10 for each unit sold, as well as any additional damages determined by the court.
Every accomplishment starts with the decision to try.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+
Simple Definition
A nonparticipating royalty is a type of payment made to an author or inventor for each copy of their work or article sold under a copyright or patent. This means that the author or inventor receives a set amount of money for each sale, but does not have any ownership or control over the product being sold. If there is no established royalty, a court will determine a reasonable amount of payment for the use of the intellectual property. This type of royalty is often used in cases of patent, copyright, trademark infringement, or misappropriation of trade secrets.
A 'reasonable person' is a legal fiction I'm pretty sure I've never met.
✨ Enjoy an ad-free experience with LSD+