Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Strict scrutiny

Read a random definition: perfected security interest

A quick definition of Strict scrutiny:

Strict scrutiny is a way for courts to decide if a law is okay or not. It's used when someone sues the government for treating them unfairly. To pass strict scrutiny, the government must have a really good reason for making the law, and the law has to be made in a way that doesn't hurt people more than it needs to. This is the highest standard of review that courts use to decide if a law is fair or not. It's used when the law affects a really important right or group of people, like race or religion. It's also used for things like free speech and gun laws.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Strict scrutiny is a legal standard used by courts to determine if a law is constitutional. It is often used in cases where a plaintiff sues the government for discrimination. To pass strict scrutiny, the government must have a "compelling interest" for passing the law and the law must be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.

Examples: Strict scrutiny is often used in cases involving equal protection, where a law infringes upon a fundamental right or involves a suspect classification such as race, national origin, religion, or alienage. For example, if a state passes a law that only allows white people to vote, a court would use strict scrutiny to determine if the law is constitutional. Another example is restrictions on content-based speech, which are also reviewed under the strict scrutiny standard.

Explanation: Strict scrutiny is the highest standard of review used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. It requires the government to have a compelling interest for passing the law and the law must be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The examples illustrate how strict scrutiny is used in cases involving equal protection and restrictions on speech. In both cases, the government must have a compelling interest for passing the law and the law must be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.

Strict Liability | strike

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
esoterica
21:30
I like northwestern law location a lot but I did a self guided tour there and this 3L I met told me that if I want to do public interest I shouldn't go there bc career services provides no support
MrThickRopes
0:37
I fukcking
MrThickRopes
0:37
really loved this girk
MrThickRopes
0:37
girl
MrThickRopes
0:38
but legislation preventented me from saying so
MrThickRopes
0:38
he is perfect. she would be perfect before m after, or diuring if he was in charge
1:10
is he perfect?
[deleted by starfishies]
[deleted by starfishies]
[deleted by starfishies]
[deleted by starfishies]
love amirite
alexa play marvin gaye
globalcitizen
9:58
These are the kinda freaks collecting 100% disability , we work hard everyday to subsidize these buffoons
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: I am too that’s why I’m a Tulane crashout rn
18:54
yall we didn’t have to report if we were the complaining party in a criminal case right for character and fitness
18:55
omg i’m scared
18:56
like if i sued my ex for whoopin my azz
19:37
Red flag
19:38
suing someone for being a little freaky 🤪 💀
19:39
LMAO CRAZY
19:40
[deleted by esoterica]
19:41
[deleted by esoterica]
13:51
@esoterica: thanks 🙏 it was a bad joke
how can I look up data on are applicants on here?
It depends how they phrased the question. Some questions just ask if you've ever been charged
starfishies
9:29
good morning
my message disapeared aw
starfishies
9:32
esoterica are u here lemme dm u if u are !
anyone who's waiting for cardozo get a date change in the status checker yday?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.