Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

pro–con debate

Read a random definition: reciprocal interinsurance exchange

A quick definition of pro–con debate:

A pro-con debate is a formal discussion where people take turns giving speeches for or against a motion. The goal is to consider the merits of the motion and come to a decision. The debate can be controlled by a leader who manages the time for each side, or it can be extended beyond a set time limit. Sometimes, there are restrictions on the debate, and speeches must alternate between opposing viewpoints.

A more thorough explanation:

A pro-con debate is a type of debate where speakers take turns presenting arguments for or against a motion or proposition. The goal is to persuade the audience or the opposing side to agree with their point of view.

For example, in a pro-con debate about whether or not to legalize marijuana, one speaker might argue that it should be legalized because it has medical benefits and could generate tax revenue. Another speaker might argue against legalization, citing concerns about addiction and negative effects on public health.

The alternating speeches in a pro-con debate help ensure that both sides are heard and that the audience can make an informed decision. However, sometimes one side may have more speakers than the other, in which case the chair may allow multiple speeches in a row from the same side.

proclamator | pro–con divorce

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
NosyBeagle
13:52
look at my lawyer dawg... im going to jail
Nah, I don't use it to do my case law. Just the actual motion drafting.
For example, I was trying to get the right language in a Motion for Sanctions (tl;dr slip and fall case, defense counsel played nothing but games – IE never sending records despite it being mandatory to trcp, producing never before seen records DURING A DEPO) and just talked to ChatGPT about his behavior to provide background to help with the drafting for the procedural paragraph.
@NosyBeagle: just makes me think of vanillamace
@TiredOfThisGrandpa: I dont have LSD+ so cant dm but will def hit you up when I have them done! Also is ur username a reference to holes? lol
Can i get accommodations for mid test 2 hour nap
I mean, i have sadhd
15:34
you could get accommodations for the schizoaffective disorder you clearly have
NosyBeagle
15:53
a two hour nap in between sections would be great for me
ronniedoeslaw
15:58
LSAT isn’t horrible you just have to lock in really hard for 2 hours and expect to be exhausted the rest of the day mentally
16:30
ugh i hit this lady w my car
16:31
well i hit her car and the cops said there's no damage but she says there is should i call my insurance what u think lawyers
real quick question. How much do early applications matter? I have super strong softs and an ok LSAT score of 160. GPA wasn't great at 3.33. I applied in late march and I have been rejected everywhere so far
16:58
late march is way too late
16:58
early doesn’t matter but before thanksgiving matters
ronniedoeslaw
16:59
Have you used the LSAC search for schools link? It helps a lot letting you know the probability of acceptance.
I mean early early might be overblown but dont apply if you are applying in march
does anyone know how many questions they typically ask for the UT recorded interview
20:21
has anyone been accepted off of the waitlist for New England yet?
ronniedoeslaw
20:36
No yet for me, I was waitlisted on Monday
ronniedoeslaw
20:36
Not *
[deleted by esoterica]
don't be a dick bro
ronniedoeslaw
14:19
Foreal
ronniedoeslaw
14:20
The name says it all lol
12:58
Hello. To the gooners that have been on this site for 2+ years, you might remember me, or you might not. I was a high school freshman back then asking for advice (obvi pretty dumb at that age), and now I am a junior going to apply to colleges this summer. I had a few questions for the T14 law students here.
13:01
1. Does major matter in law school admissions? I want to go into corporate and/or IP law, so I'm thinking about majoring in Finance at some schools and Political Science at others, depending on which is stronger. I want a good job outlook in case I change my mind in the process, I'm pretty young after all. 2. To the T14 KJD admits: Give me your best advice. I want to get into T14 law schools, and similar to college admissions into undergrad, I wish I knew a lot of stuff earlier. What are some things you can tell me that can increase my chances of admission significantly?
13:03
3. How important is the undergrad program you go into? Will it help you in law school admissions and/or job placement and networking?
13:05
4. My most important question: Think back to when you were 17 (my age). If there was something you wish you knew then, what would it be? This can be anything. I don't have many people around me that go into law (everyone either goes into business or CS/engineering), so your advice is valued and highly-regarded by me.
@ParaamShinde: If you are going to go to Law School, find out and make sure you attend an undergraduate school that is on a 4.3 grade scale, not a 4.0. Regardless of what LSAC says, they do NOT weight this scale to account for schools that do not give A+ grades and thus, disadvantages applicants who are on a 4.0 scale. A very overlooked pro tip that makes a huge difference, at least today. Good luck.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.