Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de medietate linguae

Read a random definition: board of directors

A quick definition of de medietate linguae:

Term: de medietate linguae

Definition: De medietate linguae means "of half-tongue" in Law Latin. It refers to a type of jury that is made up of an equal number of people who are from the country where the trial is taking place and people who are from other countries. This type of jury was originally used in commercial cases when one party was from another country, but it was later used in criminal cases too. If there weren't enough people from other countries to make up the jury, the trial would still go ahead with the people who were available.

A more thorough explanation:

de medietate linguae

de medietate linguae is a term used in law to describe a jury that is made up of an equal number of native and foreign jurors. This type of jury was originally created by King Edward III for commercial cases where one party was a foreigner. Later, it was also used in criminal cases. If there were not enough foreign jurors available, the trial would proceed with the available number.

An example of de medietate linguae would be a trial where half of the jurors are American citizens and the other half are citizens of another country. Another example would be a trial where half of the jurors are fluent in English and the other half are not.

These examples illustrate the definition of de medietate linguae because they show how the jury is made up of an equal number of native and foreign jurors. This type of jury is used to ensure that both sides of the case are represented fairly and that there is no bias towards one side or the other.

demease | de medio

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
19:28
I think you can try it
19:28
Until they decline
19:29
Do u think many WL movement will come next week?
19:45
I’d say give it two weeks and we will start to see some WL movement but who can say for sure when it’ll really begin
19:45
Blind leading the blind I think
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
19:52
Once you deposit you lose a lot of leverage
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
19:52
It’s still possible but harder
Ijustwannagetinman
19:58
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: even if I can show them a competing offer?
Ijustwannagetinman
19:58
My Georgetown scholarship is still pending but i doubt a decision comes before Wednesday
Ijustwannagetinman
19:59
Also a Stanford A reported from today?
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
20:07
@Ijustwannagetinman: it’s still possible but you lose leverage because you’ve already given them money so they assume you’re more attached to their school
Attemptingapplications
20:09
SLS A was me. I was accepted last week but made an error when clicking the date. I fixed it.
20:11
Also at that point you won’t get much more too but they may try to make it binding. I’ve seen a few places (not GULC FTR) that give like a 5-10K increase but it is binding
20:11
Also congrats on Stanford!!!
Ijustwannagetinman
20:26
I’m hoping to get off a waitlist and delusional wanna try to get money from that school if I get in lol
Thanks for the R sent to my home, Stanford.
Could have just sent me an email or a status checker update.
Ijustwannagetinman
20:49
@CanWeTalkAboutTerrenceMalick: did ur lawhub ever update
I don't have lawhub. In fairness to Stanford, it may be that my status checker for Stanford has already indicated that I was rejected. I haven't checked since I knew there was next to no chance I would get in. I just don't understand the need to send someone an R admissions decision to their home.
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
21:02
haha I know i was feral when they sent the R snail mail
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
21:02
unhinged adcom behavior
I think it's just Stanford reminding you that they have money to waste and still didn't want you. So yeah, unhinged adcom behavior indeed.
@WasabiPirates: By the way, we have the same "goal." I also want to be a federal judge. Well, I would also be happy with one of certain state judgeships. May I ask what you're thinking your ideal career trajectory would be prior to, you hope, landing a federal judgeship? Like, do you want to be in private practice beforehand, government, both?
Anyone still waiting to hear back from NDLS
Ijustwannagetinman
22:24
Ugh I never got a password from Stanford
Ijustwannagetinman
22:24
I wish I knew if they’d rejected me
Ijustwannagetinman
22:24
Already
SymptomaticFoxhound
22:31
wishing everyone lots of As this week
LuckyDog
23:40
Praying🙏
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.