A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Inconvenient forum refers to the legal doctrine that allows a court to dismiss a case if it appears that another forum would be more convenient for the litigants and witnesses, even if the current court has jurisdiction over the case. This means that the court can refuse to hear a case if it believes that another court would be a better place to hear the case.

Example: A person living in California files a lawsuit against a company based in New York in a California court. However, the company argues that the case should be heard in a New York court because all the witnesses and evidence are located in New York. The California court may dismiss the case based on the doctrine of inconvenient forum and require the plaintiff to file the case in a New York court.

This example illustrates how the doctrine of inconvenient forum can be used to ensure that a case is heard in the most appropriate forum for all parties involved. It allows the court to consider the convenience of the litigants and witnesses, as well as the availability of evidence and other factors, in determining whether to hear a case or dismiss it in favor of another court.