Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

conclusion of fact

Read a random definition: conubium

A quick definition of conclusion of fact:

Conclusion of fact means the decision made by the person who decides the facts in a case. When people disagree about what happened, the person who decides the case has to listen to the evidence and decide what really happened. This decision is called a conclusion of fact. It can be made by a group of people called a jury or by a judge. The conclusion of fact is very important because it decides who wins the case. If there is a disagreement about what happened, the judge cannot make a quick decision until the disagreement is solved. When someone disagrees with the conclusion of fact, they can ask a higher court to look at it, but the higher court will only change it if the person who decided the case made a big mistake. This is different from a conclusion of law, which is looked at more carefully by a higher court.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A conclusion of fact, also known as a finding of fact, is a decision made by the trier of fact on questions of fact in a case. This decision is made after parties present evidence, and the trier of fact must decide what the facts actually are. Conclusions of fact may be made by a jury or judges depending on agreement by the parties. These conclusions often dictate the outcome of a trial.

For example, in a criminal trial, the prosecution may present evidence that the defendant committed the crime. The defense may present evidence that the defendant did not commit the crime. The jury must then decide what the facts are and whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. This decision is a conclusion of fact.

Conclusions of fact receive deferential treatment on appeal, meaning that an appellate court will only overturn a conclusion of fact if the trier of fact obviously made an error. This is to be contrasted with a conclusion of law which will receive higher scrutiny.

It is important to note that if there is a question of fact, a judge cannot enter a summary judgement until the factual dispute is resolved.

conclusion | conclusion of law

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:17
I need hope
17:18
Like tbh what was the point of wl everyone like i dont get it
17:19
Yes @helllllwooooods
17:20
Im about to call vandy and ask about this i saw that on lsd
@CallHerDaddy: you only applied to two schools?
17:49
I got into Umiami
17:49
I dont want to go ther
17:58
i am the worst nu applicant bruh. i never did the initial interview and got the wl, and i never did the waitlist interview either lol
RebelMelodicLion
18:04
if someone does call vandy and asks pls lmk
@CallHerDaddy: give them a lap dance through the video interview, instant full ride
18:42
@Hellwoods2025: knew i loved you
@CallHerDaddy: <3
SuaveCrouton
22:38
Word on the street is vandy over admitted and so wont be drawing on much of the WL
22:41
Shhhhh @suave
22:41
We dont need that energy here
Any of y’all get hit with the back to back Cornell Rs
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:49
had some pineapples and pistachios for a snack
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:49
was really good
KnowledgeableRitzyWasp
22:49
just letting chat know
What materials are you all using to prepare for 1L? I've heard of Law Hub and Barbri. Do you recommend any?
im chillin until the teachers start teaching
babybunny
8:58
thousand island stare rn
ripballs
10:11
BALLS IS BACK BABY FUCK ARARARAR
ripballs
10:11
@Hellwoods2025: LETS GOOOOO
@babybunny: nice
CTCSH
12:35
Free balls
@SpectacularDefiantMouse: JD adivisng! their prep course is completey free
15:38
Anyone here call or something and know if GULC is pretty full or still got a decent bit of room? O-O
Anyone here from ND
CTCSH
16:47
No, just asians and new yorkers
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.