Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Roth v. United States (1957)

Read a random definition: pattern jury charge

A quick definition of Roth v. United States (1957):

Roth v. United States is a court case that happened in 1957. The court decided that it is not okay to say or show things that are very inappropriate or dirty. This means that the First Amendment, which protects free speech, does not protect this kind of speech. The person who brought the case, Roth, was selling books that were considered very dirty and he got in trouble for it. The court said that it was okay for the government to stop him from doing that. Some people on the court disagreed, but most of them thought it was important to stop people from saying or showing things that are very inappropriate.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Roth v. United States is a 1957 Supreme Court case that established that obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment. This means that the government can regulate or even ban speech or materials that are considered obscene. The case involved a man named Roth who was convicted for mailing obscene materials. He argued that his First Amendment rights were being violated, but the Court disagreed.

Example: An example of obscenity that would not be protected by the First Amendment is child pornography. This is because it is considered harmful and offensive to society, and has no redeeming value. Another example might be a book or movie that contains extremely graphic and explicit sexual content that is intended solely to arouse the reader or viewer.

Explanation: The Court's decision in Roth v. United States means that the government can regulate or even ban materials that are considered obscene, even if they have some artistic or literary value. The Court established that obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment because it is not considered a legitimate form of expression. The examples given illustrate how the government might apply this standard in practice, by banning materials that are considered harmful or offensive to society.

roll over | rout

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
haha suckers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
20:38
prolly have a lil family and hobbies what loosers
hahah losers like what? you travel? have a life? not me, i'm reading every line of a contract while my seniors go play golf and enjoy like hahaha suckers
20:40
yea inverse perspective, what is fun is not fun and what is not fun is fun
20:40
you get it.
i wanna be able to travel a ton too
my ex just posted a harry potter related joke i think i dodged a bullet
20:41
Im only going to law school to recruit members for the revolution
20:41
nice where u wanna go? yea bullet dodged fr
can we join even if we're not at ur school
20:44
yeah but youd be in a different chapter
20:44
are we revolting against people who do not use their signal whilst driving?
20:44
We’re revolting against the man, man
20:45
Power does not flow from the sleeve of a judges robe to paraphrase
fuck yeah i'm down
MrThickRopes
20:46
uhhh
MrThickRopes
20:46
Yeeeeaahh
MrThickRopes
20:46
PUT DA BEAT ON BRUH
20:48
Aight yall can join but I call dibs on being assassinated
MrThickRopes
20:49
Unc unc unc unc unc
MrThickRopes
20:49
Up in da club
MrThickRopes
20:49
Up in da club uns uns uns uns uns uns
the unction
20:55
just got a DUI while drinkin an NA beer in my car
20:55
someone help is some1 a hoya lowya here?!
MrThickRopes
21:03
Yoooo wtf
21:03
jk ropes but I do got ops fr
MrThickRopes
21:12
Me too bruh they praying on my downfall fr
21:19
bruh i got ppl tryna make my head a brain smoothie
21:19
serve me with some margarita mix and agave sweetener and summ
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.