Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

opinion testimony

Read a random definition: Great Inquest

A quick definition of opinion testimony:

Opinion testimony is when someone gives their opinion or belief about something instead of stating facts they directly witnessed. This can come from a regular person or an expert witness. It can be allowed in court under certain conditions. Other types of testimony include affirmative testimony, which is when someone testifies about something they saw or heard, and written testimony, which is when someone gives their testimony in writing instead of in person.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Opinion testimony is evidence given by a witness based on their belief or idea rather than on direct knowledge of the facts at issue.

For example, a witness may testify that they believe a defendant is guilty based on their personal opinion, rather than on any direct evidence they have seen or heard. This type of testimony is allowed under certain conditions, and can come from either a lay witness or an expert witness.

Opinion testimony can be contrasted with affirmative testimony, which is testimony about whether something occurred or did not occur, based on what the witness saw or heard at the time and place in question. It can also be contrasted with negative testimony, which is testimony that something did not happen.

Overall, opinion testimony is important in legal proceedings because it can help to provide context and interpretation of the facts at issue, but it must be carefully evaluated to ensure that it is based on a rational understanding of the evidence.

opinion rule | opinion work product

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
AngryMiniCar
16:15
Not my entire race lmao
DarioDarko
16:15
Okay so this is a racist thing
eggan
16:15
ok lol ok im done engaging. anyway. hows everyones date
GO look at biglaw lawyers complaing about the crops since 2022 when the 2019 lsat changes started to impact things, they notice they need 16 hours to do what a 2008 grad did in 8
eggan
16:15
day*
AngryMiniCar
16:16
good until I got a -16 on RC cause I can't read. Lowkey paradoxical because LRs I get -1/-3
AngryMiniCar
16:16
Hbu lol
Usually -0 LG -0 LR -2 Rc
AngryMiniCar
16:16
Gimme some of that
eggan
16:16
ooo i have advice from a 169 scorer. basically with RC the main things you need to do to prepare are to pretend what youre reading is the most interesting thing ever, and prepare by reading more fiction (for adults)
eggan
16:17
novels like metamorphosis, brave new world, no longer human, crime & punishment, those kinds of novels for adults with complex language structure will be helpful (im just listing books i like but you can read anything)
Read moby dick
NosyBeagle
16:18
@AngryMiniCar: ill trade u for your lr score lol
NosyBeagle
16:18
@windyMagician: sounds good. I will start doing this
AngryMiniCar
16:18
Naww I worked my asssss off for that LR result
NosyBeagle
16:18
lmaooo
eggan
16:19
you atted windy lol you probably meant to at me but thats ok
Also also, at the same time, the biglaw lawyers increasingly are going "fuck these t30 hires are really good (the non accommodated 160s who would be t14 people in 2008 over these accommodated 170s in the t14 lmfao)" lolololol Also for RC just the more you do the better you are.
AngryMiniCar
16:20
@eggan: thanks! I'll do that.
16:20
Sometimes my mind just goes blank when staring at an RC passage
16:21
what helped me most for RC was that the right answer will always be in the passage, even if its only implied
16:21
so you just have to justify your answer choice with specific line support
NosyBeagle
16:21
maybe i forgot who i was talking to. you can't scroll after a bit lol
@PremiumFrequentCrane: i dont have accomodations you absolute buffoon
NosyBeagle
16:22
trying to see if i have it in me to do another lr set
NosyBeagle
16:23
the best i've done on lr has been -10. I have a long way to go
@NosyBeagle: you need to be drilling weak question types and not doing full sets if you're at -10
NosyBeagle
16:25
@windyMagician: i would send the salute emoji if this website supported them
NosyBeagle
16:25
will start doing this
here u go: 🫡
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.