Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

complete defense

Read a random definition: declaration against interest

A quick definition of complete defense:

A complete defense is a way to say "I didn't do anything wrong" and make the whole case go away. It works in both civil and criminal cases. If you can prove a complete defense, you don't have to pay any money or go to jail. Sometimes, one complete defense can work for many different claims. Examples of complete defenses are when someone said it was okay to do something, when something bad happened that nobody could control, or when someone was forced to do something because they were too drunk or high to know what they were doing.

A more thorough explanation:

A complete defense is a type of defense that can be used in both civil lawsuits and criminal proceedings. It is an affirmative defense that can nullify an entire claim against the defendant. If a complete defense is successfully established, it absolves the party from any and all liability for a given act. This is different from a mitigation defense, which only reduces liability but does not remove it entirely.

Complete defenses can be used to defend against multiple claims, as establishing a complete defense for one claim can often act as a complete defense against other claims. For example, if a defendant successfully establishes that they had consent to perform a certain act, it can act as a complete defense against any claims of assault or battery.

Examples of complete defenses include:

  • Consent: If the plaintiff consented to the defendant's actions, it can act as a complete defense against any claims of wrongdoing.
  • Act of God: If the defendant's actions were caused by an unforeseeable natural event, such as a hurricane or earthquake, it can act as a complete defense.
  • Involuntary Intoxication: If the defendant was unknowingly intoxicated and did not have control over their actions, it can act as a complete defense.
  • Contributory Negligence: In jurisdictions that follow contributory negligence, if the plaintiff was also negligent and contributed to their own injuries, it can act as a complete defense.

For example, if a defendant is accused of assault but can prove that the plaintiff consented to the physical contact, it can act as a complete defense against the assault claim. Similarly, if a defendant is accused of causing property damage but can prove that the damage was caused by an act of God, it can act as a complete defense against the property damage claim.

complementarity | complete integration

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:23
sorry im coping
17:23
i have not heard back from a single school
have you tried looking at your status checkers?
17:24
alll I do is stare at stus checkers and I have lost allllll social cues
ohhhh then you should try reloading ur email
that helps too
17:25
I like it when the schools edge me and send me a false positive
17:25
i get sad that the wait is over
17:25
but then happy when they tell me it was an accident
flooding their email with messages always works too
17:27
Im fasting, no water for me
vandy wave today??
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:03
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: 14 people marked that they were accepted today
seems like theyre running low on As..
18:10
SMU WL wave
18:10
I missed it
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:12
@MrThickRopes: 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Woot woot!
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:13
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: saw this on Reddit today. A guesstimate on how many As are left in the T100
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
18:14
The person who had been posting them on Reddit for awhile was hired by Spivey to do it for them
Got in to SMU last week. Reapplicant, 174 LSAT 3.71 UGPA 3.92 Graduate GPA, 2 Years work as a consultant. Dean's Scholarship. Should I ask for reconsideration?
wombocombo
19:21
@ChampionofThraben: wait and see if you get other offers to counter with. Otherwise you're just begging basically
Have a full ride from UofR to counter with, not sure they are near peer enough
What is the best law school I can go to with 3.17 GPA and 166 LSAT (I scored 177 but the average is 166 because I scored a 154 also)
Law schools generally consider the highest score rather than average unless they specifically state the latter.
That is amazing, what about someone with a finding of misconduct and irregularity of faking a transcript? Can someone even be a lawyer with a misconduct and irregularity? I think yes because there are people who have criminal records and are lawyers, but faking a transcript? The ones I found are people with drug charges but not faking a transcript
23:23
Sounds like you faked a transcript?
did i seriously miss another bc wave? applied mid november
I’m not gonna get in anywhere
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.