🏅 UnreasonableWoman, SLS '24 |

Zapatha v. Dairy Mart, Inc.

408 N.E.2d 1370 (S.J.C. M.A. 1980)

tl;dr: Plaintiffs opened up a franchise of Defendant's store. In their agreement, there was a termination clause allowing for either party to terminate the contract at will. Defendants did so, but Plaintiff claimed the termination clause was unconscionable.

Warning

Info

Zapatha v. Dairy Mart, Inc.

IRACIssue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion

🤯 High points 🤯Key points contributed by students on LSD

Facts & Holding

Facts:Plaintiffs Zapathas brought an action to enjoin Defendant Dairy Mart...

Holding:Reversed. When Defendant Dairy Mart terminated the agreement, it did...

Zapatha v. Dairy Mart, Inc.

Help us make LSD better!